<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMFS 3 versions &#8211; maybe you should upgrade your vmfs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vfrank.org/2010/01/31/vmfs-3-versions-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vfrank.org/2010/01/31/vmfs-3-versions-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vmfs-3-versions-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs</link>
	<description>Essense of virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.vfrank.org/2010/01/31/vmfs-3-versions-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vfrank.org/?p=56#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Not sure what you are trying to say but the information is misleading. All the enhancements are made in the Driver or though the addition of filters or new components (datamover), but not on a filesystem level.

http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2011/02/25/re-vmfs-3-versions-%E2%80%93-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what you are trying to say but the information is misleading. All the enhancements are made in the Driver or though the addition of filters or new components (datamover), but not on a filesystem level.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2011/02/25/re-vmfs-3-versions-%E2%80%93-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2011/02/25/re-vmfs-3-versions-%E2%80%93-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RE: VMFS 3 versions – maybe you should upgrade your vmfs? » Yellow Bricks</title>
		<link>http://www.vfrank.org/2010/01/31/vmfs-3-versions-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>RE: VMFS 3 versions – maybe you should upgrade your vmfs? » Yellow Bricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vfrank.org/?p=56#comment-602</guid>
		<description>[...] person was referred to an article by Frank Brix Pedersen who states the following: Ever since ESX3.0 we have used the VMFS3 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] person was referred to an article by Frank Brix Pedersen who states the following: Ever since ESX3.0 we have used the VMFS3 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMFS versions and upgrade paths &#124; Virtualization Adapted</title>
		<link>http://www.vfrank.org/2010/01/31/vmfs-3-versions-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>VMFS versions and upgrade paths &#124; Virtualization Adapted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vfrank.org/?p=56#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.vfrank.org/2010/01/31/vmfs-3-versions-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.vfrank.org/2010/01/31/vmfs-3-versions-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.vfrank.org/2010/01/31/vmfs-3-versions-maybe-you-should-upgrade-your-vmfs/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

